Staying With the Tension

If your instinct is to get rid of tension as quickly as possible, you’re not alone. It feels efficient. It feels mature.

And it’s also how tension ends up in hallway retellings instead of shared conversations.

Picture this:  You’re on a video call with a small team, walking through an approach you’ve used successfully before.  You’ve done this long enough to know what you’re doing.

Halfway through, a newer colleague—talented, but early in their career—jumps in. “I just don’t think that’s going to work,” they say. “It feels outdated.”

There’s a beat of silence.

It’s not just disagreement; it feels like deliberate disrespect. You feel a quick internal flare, and the heat rises before your thoughts can organize themselves. You haven’t even been here long enough to understand why we do it this way!

You keep your tone level and ask them to explain. On the surface, you look composed. This is the mature way to handle it, right?

Maybe.  But internally, the ground has shifted.

 

What Just Happened?

Before you consciously choose a response, the part of your brain that scans for threat (amygdala) has registered: “Status Risk!”  Your experience is being challenged. The signal doesn’t pause for analysis; it simply activates.

What’s going on here?  Under threat, your brain’s resources reallocate.

The part of your brain responsible for flexible reasoning and impulse control (prefrontal cortex) has slightly less range. The circuitry that helps you imagine what someone else might be thinking or feeling quiets down. Your attentional networks narrow toward the perceived source of the challenge.

Here’s the thing: you don’t experience this as, “Oh, I can tell my cognitive resources are being allocated to protect me from a threat.”

No—you experience this as clarity, which makes you feel even more certain about your approach.

You listen, but mostly for flaws in their thinking. You respond with more explanation than curiosity. Your voice tightens just enough to signal authority.

And you leave irrationally irritated.

 

Where Tension Travels Next

Later, you replay the moment. You tell a trusted colleague, “I couldn’t believe the way they said that.” The story sharpens slightly in the retelling. The edge hardens.

And that’s how the tension in the room moves into side conversations and backhanded insults. It was uncomfortable to feel challenged like that, so you didn’t let the tension live openly long enough to be understood. 

The consequence?  It lives and grows under the surface, quietly building to a future confrontation.

 

Staying in the tension is difficult because it feels like giving up ground. It feels like allowing disrespect to stand unchallenged. Your nervous system prefers certainty and restoring status quickly. And neurologically, you are primed for that move—when the amygdala flags threat, defensive clarity feels stabilizing.

The prefrontal cortex has less flexibility at precisely the moment you need it most, and perspective-taking circuitry has less access to curiosity.

 

Keeping it in the Room

What would it have meant to stay with the tension instead of overriding it? To notice it and remain present while it’s there?

You’ve probably seen it before from a leader you admired but couldn’t name why.  It’s quiet.  It begins with acknowledging the tension, giving it permission to live without blaming anyone for it.

And then it might sound like: “I want to pause for a second. That landed more strongly than I would have expected, and I’m noticing that.” And then, “Help me understand what feels outdated about it. I may be missing something.”

Or maybe it’s: “I can feel myself reacting to how that came across, and I don’t want to gloss over it. Can we slow this down for a minute?”

The tone is steady, not rushed or sharp.  Curious without being submissive. It’s not avoiding the experience. It signals a willingness to stay in the discomfort long enough to examine it openly rather than exporting it elsewhere.

That is what keeps tension from traveling into hallway conversations or reputational narratives that calcify.

You will feel the tightening. That part is inevitable. The question is whether you let it quietly harden into a story about the other person—or whether you learn to stay present long enough to work with it in real time.


Questions Leaders Ask

In this week's Conflict EQ Lens, we explore what happens when tension enters a conversation. Many leaders instinctively try to eliminate tension as quickly as possible. Yet unresolved tension rarely disappears. More often, it moves somewhere else—into assumptions, side conversations, frustration, or future conflict. The challenge is learning to stay present long enough to understand what the tension is trying to tell us.

Why do I react so strongly when someone challenges my ideas?

Challenges can trigger concerns about credibility, competence, authority, or status. Even when the disagreement is professional and well-intended, the brain may interpret it as a threat. These reactions often occur before conscious reasoning has fully engaged, making it difficult to remain curious and open in the moment.

What happens in the brain when tension rises?

When the brain detects a potential threat, attention narrows and resources shift toward protection. People often become more focused on defending their perspective, protecting their reputation, or restoring certainty. As a result, curiosity, perspective-taking, and flexible thinking may become harder to access.

Why do disagreements sometimes linger long after a meeting ends?

When tension is not fully explored or addressed, people often continue processing the interaction long after it is over. They replay conversations, assign meaning to comments, and seek validation from others. What begins as an unresolved moment can gradually evolve into assumptions, frustration, or resentment.

What are hallway conversations?

Hallway conversations occur when people discuss concerns, frustrations, or disagreements with others instead of addressing them directly with the person involved. While these conversations may provide temporary relief, they often reinforce assumptions and allow tension to grow rather than resolve.

What does it mean to stay with the tension?

Staying with the tension means resisting the urge to immediately dismiss, defend against, or escape discomfort. Instead, leaders acknowledge the tension, remain present, and explore what is happening beneath the surface. This creates opportunities for understanding before assumptions become entrenched.

How can leaders respond constructively when they feel challenged?

Effective leaders begin by noticing their reaction rather than acting from it. Pausing, acknowledging the tension, asking questions, and seeking to understand the other person's perspective can help keep the conversation productive. Curiosity often creates more value than immediate certainty.

Is tension always a sign that something is wrong?

No. Tension is often a natural byproduct of different perspectives, competing priorities, or important decisions. In many cases, tension signals that something meaningful is being discussed. The goal is not to eliminate tension but to engage with it constructively.

What is Conflict EQ?

Conflict EQ is the ability to remain grounded, curious, and constructive when tension, disagreement, or difficult conversations arise. A key part of Conflict EQ is developing the capacity to stay present with tension long enough to understand it rather than immediately reacting to it or allowing it to migrate into future conflict.

Previous
Previous

Conflict isn't the problem. Capacity collapse is.

Next
Next

Before You Say a Word